Supply Chain Impact: Real vs Artificial Christmas Trees

Christmas trees are a seasonal staple, but their environmental footprint sparks debate. Examining the supply chain for real and artificial trees reveals surprising impacts.

The environmental cost of real christmas trees

For many, a real Christmas tree is the essence of Christmas. Farms producing these trees are often touted as sustainable because they grow for years before being harvested, absorbing CO2 and providing a habitat for wildlife during that time. However, the supply chain tells a more complex story.

Most real trees in the UK are grown domestically, often on small-scale farms. Yet, in Europe and North America, large-scale production drives the industry, with trees frequently transported hundreds of miles before reaching retailers. This adds significant emissions from transportation, particularly when trucks carry loads over long distances to distribution centres and finally to local markets. Seasonal demand creates logistical bottlenecks, requiring intensive planning and just-in-time shipping to avoid wastage.

Disposal is another issue. While many local authorities offer recycling programmes for real trees, allowing them to be turned into mulch or compost, a substantial number still end up in landfills. As they decompose, they release methane, a potent greenhouse gas. This creates further pressure on waste management systems already overwhelmed during the holiday season.

Artificial Trees: Convenience at an environmental price

Artificial trees are often marketed as a low-maintenance alternative to real ones. These are typically made from PVC plastic and steel, both of which require significant energy and resources to produce. The production processes for these materials are highly carbon-intensive, contributing to their larger upfront environmental cost.

What makes the supply chain of artificial trees particularly impactful is the global manufacturing system behind them. Most artificial trees are made in China, where production relies on coal-powered energy sources. After manufacturing, they are shipped internationally, creating a supply chain with a heavy carbon footprint. From factories to ports and then to distribution centres, these products travel thousands of miles before reaching consumers. The globalised nature of this supply chain involves multiple emissions-heavy modes of transport, including shipping and road freight, making logistics a critical factor in their environmental impact.

An artificial tree must be reused for around 10 years to offset its environmental footprint compared to a real tree purchased annually. However, many people replace them after only six years due to wear and tear or changing aesthetic preferences, which reduces their sustainability. Unlike real trees, artificial ones cannot be recycled efficiently. Most end up in landfills, where their plastic components can take centuries to break down, leaching chemicals into the soil.

Supply chain pressures and the bigger picture

Both real and artificial trees highlight how seasonal consumer demand strains supply chains. Real trees rely on efficient harvesting and distribution networks, often hampered by unpredictable weather and narrow production windows. Artificial trees, on the other hand, depend on global shipping networks, which face challenges from rising fuel costs and geopolitical instability.

Increasingly, retailers are adapting by offering 'rent-a-tree' services, where live potted trees are delivered and collected post-holiday for replanting. These services offer an innovative supply chain model, reducing waste and cutting emissions. Additionally, some companies are exploring alternative materials for artificial trees, such as recycled plastics or biodegradable options, which could significantly reduce their environmental footprint over time.

The environmental debate also intersects with broader supply chain practices, such as how manufacturers source raw materials and manage energy use during production. For artificial trees, switching to renewable energy sources in factories and investing in greener shipping solutions could reduce emissions significantly. Similarly, encouraging localised farming for real trees and improving end-of-life recycling could make their supply chains more sustainable.

Finding a sustainable balance

Choosing between a real or artificial Christmas tree ultimately depends on how you plan to use and dispose of it. If you already own an artificial tree, the most sustainable option is to keep using it for as long as possible. For those considering a real tree, look for locally sourced options and check whether your council offers recycling schemes to avoid contributing to landfill waste.

Innovations in the supply chain and production processes offer hope for reducing the environmental impact of both options. As one expert notes: “Both types of trees come with trade-offs, but the goal should always be to minimise waste and make informed decisions that align with long-term sustainability goals.”

By considering the supply chain and disposal challenges, consumers can make more eco-conscious choices during the festive season.

Explore the latest edition of Supply Chain Digital Magazine and be part of the conversation at our global conference series, Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE.

Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today. 

Supply Chain Digital is a BizClik brand