Apr 13, 2021

Breaking the Hydrogen Fear for Sustainable Supply Chain

Oliver Freeman
5 min
Hydrogen is fast becoming one of the most impactful resources in the global green growth strategy, but it’s got a negative past that needs addressing.
Hydrogen is fast becoming one of the most impactful resources in the global green growth strategy, but it’s got a negative past that needs addressing...

In light of the recently announced deal between Japan and the United Arab Emirates, which will see the middle-eastern nation transport tonnes of hydrogen to Japan, to support their world-renowned green growth strategy, Supply Chain Digital is addressing the primary fear surrounding the world’s hottest commodity: that it’s extremely flammable and subsequently dangerous to use. 

The Negative Hydrogen Coverage 

Let’s start with the very well-known, incredibly problematic image of hydrogen fuel that the majority have in their mind: the Hindenburg airship aflame. It’s an intense image and, after almost a century, it continues to have a powerful effect on the masses. 

In fact, the disaster has become synonymous with hydrogen use. 


Let’s clear it up. 

The Dangers of Hydrogen 

Is hydrogen flammable? Yes, absolutely ─ the Hindenburg gave that away. In fact, hydrogen has a very wide explosive range compared to other fuels, and it’s difficult to prevent in circumstances where it might occur because you can’t smell, see, or taste the gas, and it burns with an invisible flame. Essentially, if it goes wrong, it’s incognito until it isn’t ─ by which point, it’s way too late. 

However, we need to balance this out with another crucial question: Is hydrogen more flammable or more dangerous than the fossil fuel alternatives on the market today? No. On the contrary, hydrogen is categorically safer than diesel and propane, for example. 

Hydrogen Fact File

I’m going to run you through the key characteristics of hydrogen, with the assistance of Hydrogen Tools’ Hydrogen Compared with Other Fuels, so that you can gauge it for yourself:

  • Hydrogen is 14 times lighter than air: this means that if the gas escapes the fuel cell, it disperses with haste, rising into the atmosphere at a rate of 20 metres per second in ambient temperatures. As you will already know, even if it’s just from a Hollywood film, propane and oil are far heavier than air, so they just drop to the ground and pool around, like any other liquid ─ at that point, a stray spark can ignite the whole load. 


  • In the case that hydrogen ever does come aflame, it only ever emits low radiant energy, so any resulting fire is less likely to spread to surrounding areas. To some degree, it’ll be contained. 
  • It’s a non-toxic gas, so in the case of an accident, any spillage does not have a detrimental effect on the surrounding environment. This is excellent when you consider how many times we hear about oil leaks in the news and the subsequent negative effects.
  • Statistically speaking, hydrogen is less flammable than its gasoline counterparts when it’s airborne. Gasoline is flammable whilst airborne at a lower concentration limit of 1.4 per cent, while hydrogen sits at 4 per cent ─ making the former two to three times more flammable as its vapours rise into the air. According to Mike Pearson, the optimal mixture for hydrogen combustion is 29 per cent, “which in the real world is quite unusual since hydrogen rises and will generally diffuse. Gasoline vapours optimal mixture for combustion is on 2 per cent─a ratio that is very easy to reach.” 

Demonstrating a Hydrogen Leak

In 2001, Dr Michael Swain, in collaboration with the University of Miami at Coral Gables, attempted to simulate two car fires: one created by a 1/16th inch puncture in a gasoline fuel line, the other by a leaking hydrogen connector. Below you’ll see how his experiment played out:

As you can see, the gasoline-fed fire eventually consumed the second test vehicle, eventually leaving a smouldering heap of charred steel and melted glass, while the hydrogen fire subsided in less than two minutes with little to no damage to the car. After his experiment, Swain pointed out that while the gasoline fire was the result of a simple, small hole in the fuel line ─ a case of wear and tear ─, it would take a catastrophic failure of four separate safety systems for the hydrogen fire to occur. An unlikely eventuality. 

So Why Are You So Scared?

The fact of the matter is: hydrogen is explosive and can wreak havoc if it does go off. However, assuming its users treat it carefully, as they would with any other fuel source, the gas is inherently safer than conventional fossil fuels. 

The fear, I imagine, comes from the unknown. People are generally, sustainability issues aside, happy to use petrol and diesel, which are more flammable and subsequently more dangerous than hydrogen, yet there’s an overwhelming sense of doom-mongering in the rhetoric surrounding the gas. 

So, fear aside, here are the facts when it comes to hydrogen versus fossil fuels:

  • Hydrogen fuel cells are key to zero-emissions heavy-duty transportation systems, including rail, ship, and truck transport ─ making it absolutely crucial in the supply chain’s bid for net-zero global emissions.
  • The gas is commercially available. 
  • Hydrogen is tried and tested in the modern world, in modern vehicles and systems. It works. 
  • And, most importantly, hydrogen can be produced from renewable energy sources. Fossil fuels cannot be.

I hope that’s cleared up some of the fears that any hydrogen-fuelled vehicle or system is going to go up in flames like the German passenger airship LZ 129 back in May 1937. We’re almost a century on, engineering and technology have come a long way, and it’s crucial that we start to use an alternative, environmentally friendly method to fuel our world. 

Share article

Jun 16, 2021

Gartner: Women in supply chain at five-year high

3 min
Overall percentage of women working in supply chain has risen, but concerns persist around declining representation in executive leadership

Women now represent a greater percentage of the supply chain workforce than at any other point in at least the past five years, according to a recent Gartner survey. 

The Women in Supply Chain Survey 2021, conducted by Gartner and Awesome, surveyed 223 supply chain organisations with more than $100m in annual revenue from February through to the end of March 2021.

Key takeaways 

  • Women represent 2% more of supply chain workforce than in 2020
  • Women now account for 42% of the workforce
  • Number of women in exec-level positions declined by 2%
  • Just 15% of top leadership are women (17% in 2020)
  • 84% of organisations say COVID-19 did not impact efforts to advance women

It found that women now represent two per cent more of the supply chain workforce than in 2020, accounting for 42%, compared with 39% last year. Dana Stiffler, Vice President Analyst with the Gartner Supply Chain practice, says the impact of COVID-19 on supply chain was significant, though different to other sectors. 

"Contrary to other industries, supply chain’s mission-criticality during the COVID-19 pandemic has meant that many sectors did not reduce their workforce, but rather continued to hire and even faced talent shortages, especially in the product supply chains," she said. "This resulted in many women not only standing their ground in supply chain organisations but increasing their representation in organisations. We also recorded a record number of specific commitments and supply chain-led actions and saw existing programs starting to pay off."

Gartner Women in Supply Chain Survey 2021
Women in Supply Chain Survey 2021


Supply chain still lacks women in executive leadership 

But the elephant in the boardroom remains. Though the figures present a positive step towards greater diversity and gender equality at all levels, the number of women in executive level positions declined by two per cent in the past year. Women represent just 15% of the upper echelons of supply chain leadership. Gartner did however record a rise in women at all other levels of leadership. 

The vast majority (84%) of organisations surveyed said the outbreak had no discernible impact on their ability to retain and advance women. But more than half (54%) admitted that retaining mid-career women was becoming increasingly difficult. A lack of career opportunities was cited as the biggest challenge to this, while other blamed a lack of development opportunities. 

Despite these challenges, companies of all sizes are becoming broadly better at gender diversity. Around a third more said they had a targeted initiative focused on attracting women and advancing their careers. 

Stiffler said a push towards measurable and formal initiatives is at least pointing in the right direction: “It's encouraging to see that the larger share of this jump was for more formal targets and specific goals on management scorecards. For these respondents, there is greater accountability for results — and we see the correlation with stronger representation and inclusion showing up in pipelines.” 

Share article