How will DEI Changes Affect Beverage Supply Chains?

Share this article
Share this article
Prioritise Us on Google
Coca-Cola and Pepsi vending machines in Indianapolis (1988)
Supply Chain Digital examines Coca-Cola and Pepsico's differing approaches to DEI as US President Donald Trump encourages a national shift to drop policies

PepsiCo’s decision to roll back its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives marks a significant shift in corporate strategy—one that could have far-reaching effects on its supply chain.

While Coca-Cola doubles down on its DEI commitments, PepsiCo is moving in the opposite direction, citing a refocus on employee engagement and leadership development.

With DEI playing a key role in supplier relationships and talent retention, these changes could alter the way PepsiCo sources materials, works with suppliers and builds its workforce.

Youtube Placeholder

PepsiCo's DEI rollback

PepsiCo, the company behind brands like Gatorade, Lay’s, Doritos, Mountain Dew and its flagship Pepsi drink, is adjusting its DEI policies as political pressures mount.

In a memo to employees, CEO Ramon Laguarta confirmed that the company would no longer set targets for minority representation in its managerial positions or supplier base. While he insists inclusion remains a priority, this rollback signals a shift in how PepsiCo approaches business partnerships.

Historically, DEI initiatives have played a role in supplier diversity programmes, encouraging major corporations to work with businesses owned by women, people from minority backgrounds and other underrepresented groups.

If PepsiCo moves away from these commitments, it could lead to changes in its supplier network, potentially reducing opportunities for small or minority-owned businesses that have previously benefited from these partnerships.

PepsiCo’s decision also comes at a time when the federal government under US President Donald Trump is pressuring companies to scale back DEI efforts.

With DEI policies being rolled back across businesses, schools and government agencies, the beverage giant’s move aligns with a wider trend of reassessing diversity initiatives.

Ramon Laguarta, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer at PepsiCo

Coca-Cola stands firm

While PepsiCo steps back, Coca-Cola is reinforcing its DEI commitments. The company has updated its website to state that DEI is “at the heart of our values and our growth strategy".

Unlike PepsiCo, Coca-Cola continues to set diversity targets for its workforce and supplier network, arguing that a diverse employee base is crucial for business success.

In its annual report, the Atlanta-based company warned that failing to attract employees from diverse backgrounds could negatively impact business growth.

“Our diverse, high-performing global employee base helps drive a culture of inclusion, innovation and growth,” the company states.

Coca-Cola also remains committed to supplier diversity. By continuing to work with a broad range of suppliers, including businesses owned by women and underrepresented groups, Coca-Cola may gain an advantage in sourcing ingredients, packaging materials and distribution partnerships.

This contrast between the two beverage giants could have long-term implications for their supply chains, particularly in securing supplier relationships that align with evolving consumer and regulatory expectations.

Coca Cola Indonesia's launch of 100% recycled PET bottles, excluding caps and labels

What this means for beverage supplies

As one of the largest food and beverage companies in the world, PepsiCo’s policy change is likely to have ripple effects across the industry.

Supply chain diversity is more than just a corporate value—it has real economic implications.

Companies that prioritise diverse suppliers often build more resilient and adaptable supply chains by tapping into a wider range of producers and distributors. If PepsiCo reduces its focus on supplier diversity, it could potentially narrow its sourcing options.

On the other hand, Coca-Cola’s continued commitment to DEI could position it as a leader among brands that see diversity as a business strength rather than a political issue.

As consumers, investors and regulatory bodies scrutinise corporate policies, Coca-Cola’s firm stance may prove beneficial in maintaining supplier relationships that align with broader market trends.

With businesses and supply chains increasingly shaped by social and political forces, the question remains whether PepsiCo’s new approach will impact its access to diverse suppliers or affect its reputation among consumers and partners.

As Coca-Cola warns in its annual report: “If we are unable to attract or retain specialised talent or top talent with diverse perspectives, experiences and backgrounds that reflect the broad range of consumers and markets we serve around the world, our business could be negatively affected.”


Explore the latest edition of Supply Chain Digital and be part of the conversation at our global conference series, Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE.

Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today. 


Supply Chain Digital is a BizClik brand.