Lack of transparency persists in fashion supply chains

By Helen Adams
Fashion Revolution’s new report ‘Out of Sight’ shows that supply chain transparency in 63 major fashion brands is increasing, but progress is slow

A lack of transparency from global fashion brands regarding the origins of their supply chains can allow:

  • Working conditions to become exploitative or unsafe 
  • Damage to the environment

 

The activism movement, Fashion Revolution, is using social media to ensure that anyone, anywhere, can find out how, where, by whom and most importantly, under what conditions, their clothes are made. 

The group assembled in 2013, following the collapse of the Rana Plaza building in Bangladesh, which killed 1,132 garment workers. 

In a new report ‘Out of Sight’, Fashion Revolution has revealed that the fashion industry has a long way to go and lot to prove, to show that it has made its supply chains sustainable. 

 

Brands still reluctant to disclose supply chain details

Key findings from the ‘Out of Sight’ report include:

  • Only 2 out of 63 brands are disclosing a full list of their textile production sites, an increase of one from last year
  • 49 out of 63 brands are now disclosing the first-tier manufacturers where their garments are cut and sewn, an increase of two from last year
  • 29 brands are disclosing processing facilities such as dyehouses, while only 28 brands are disclosing production sites such as fabric mills
  • 44% of brands are disclosing at least some of their textile production sites. This is an increase of 13 percentage points since last year

 

Recognising the human and environmental impact of supply chains

Although Fashion Revolution sees any progress as a positive step, the movement wants brands to understand the urgency of taking responsibility for the impact of their supply chains.

“There is a real need for transparency beyond the first tier of manufacturing, where millions of hidden workers face labour abuses to make the fabrics in our clothes”, says Ciara Barry, Policy & Research coordinator at Fashion Revolution. “Brands must urgently take responsibility for the environmental and human rights impacts across their entire supply chains. This starts with disclosing all textile production facilities in their supply chains.” 

The company has shared a list of motions it would like fashion retailers to take on board: 

  • Brands and retailers must expand supply chain transparency by disclosing all textile production facilities in their supply chains
  • Citizens everywhere must call for greater transparency, by asking brands #WhoMadeMyFabric? on social media
  • Producers in the supply chain can share their stories using #IMadeYourFabric

 

Solidarity in the secondhand supply chain

Share

Featured Articles

Third-party supply risk 'key to survival' - Refinitiv report

The American-British global provider of financial market data and infrastructure, Refinitiv, has published a paper on how 3rd party is a key to survival

Logistics global air, sea rail & road news round-up

Rail freight body ERFA sounds legal warning to EC; China ports see traffic increase, despite lockdowns; US logistics report shows huge 2021 cost increases

IBM supply chain head's digital transformation insight

Speaking at Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE: The Risk & Resilience Conference, IBM Supply Chain Transformation Lead Bob Booth shares transformation insight

Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act & US supply chains

Sustainability

Put people at heart of supply chain transformation - Loseby

Supply Chain Risk Management

Regional supply chain problems add complexity, says Kinaxis

Logistics