Why the EU has Delayed the Deforestation-Free Supply Mandate

The European Commission confirmed on 2 October that the Regulation on Deforestation-free Products (EUDR) will be postponed by one year.

Originally set for December 2024, large businesses will now face enforcement by December 2025, while micro and small businesses have until June 2026 to comply.

This delay follows significant pressure from both internal EU stakeholders and producer nations like Indonesia. The law mandates that products like beef, coffee, soy and wood, among others, must be "deforestation-free" and legally sourced to enter the EU market.

Under the regulation, businesses will need to prove that these commodities were not grown on land deforested after 2020. This applies not only to large companies but also to smaller firms in the future.

Compliance challenges and external pressure

The decision to delay comes in response to mounting demands for more clarity on how businesses can meet the new standards. Compliance resources, which are key to guiding companies, were only released this week.

This lack of clear instructions has driven some EU governments and businesses to call for an extension. For example, Germany's Chancellor Olaf Scholz formally requested a six-month delay as recently as September.

Producer nations, especially Indonesia - a leading palm oil supplier - have also lobbied for adjustments. They argue that the law will place a disproportionate burden on smallholder farmers. Indonesia has pushed for a more lenient approach for smaller farmers, at least in the early stages of enforcement.

This extension is seen by critics as a setback for climate action. Human Rights Watch’s senior environment researcher, Luciana Tellez Chavez, voiced strong disappointment: "The decision is a deplorable abdication of leadership in the face of a climate emergency."

Luciana added that strict penalties and binding rules are essential for ensuring that companies comply with environmental standards. "The need for this law is as pressing as ever," she emphasised, highlighting its significance for climate, biodiversity and human rights.

Environmental groups speak out

Environmental organisations are equally disheartened. Julian Oram, Senior Policy Director at Mighty Earth, criticised the delay in no uncertain terms.

"Delaying the EUDR is like throwing a fire extinguisher out of the window of a burning building," Julian said. He warned that this move would lead to continued destruction of tropical forests, threatening local communities and wildlife, while also undermining global climate goals.

Despite the pushback, not all groups see the delay as detrimental. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) remains optimistic. They stated that the delay should not be interpreted as a weakening of commitment to the legislation.

Instead, they see it as an opportunity for businesses to continue preparing for compliance. “The world’s forests urgently need protection,” an FSC spokesperson said, encouraging companies to utilise FSC’s solutions to meet the future EUDR obligations.

Meanwhile, Adam Elman commented on LinkedIn that the move was "big (and not necessarily good) news."

Peter Horsten added, "But don’t be fooled by the extra time. This is not the time to sit back. The smartest players will use this window to strengthen their due diligence processes and take the lead on sustainability, rather than scrambling at the last minute."

The bigger picture: EU climate goals

The Regulation is part of a broader EU effort to curb deforestation and forest degradation linked to agricultural expansion.

With the EU being a significant consumer of commodities like cocoa, rubber and palm oil, the aim is to reduce its contribution to deforestation. By promoting “deforestation-free” products, the law is expected to cut carbon emissions by 32 million metric tonnes annually, helping the EU achieve its climate and nature protection goals.

This initiative aligns with other major EU strategies, including the European Green Deal and the Farm to Fork Strategy, which seek to tackle the root causes of deforestation. The EUDR will eventually replace the EU Timber Regulation, which previously focused on illegal logging.

Under the new rules, businesses will have to ensure that products sold in the EU are not tied to recent deforestation. They will also need to provide evidence of supply chain traceability to prove the legal origin of these goods.

As businesses navigate these evolving regulations, they must be prepared for greater scrutiny of their supply chains. Larger companies, in particular, will need to show that they meet these new standards, while smaller companies will gradually be brought into compliance over time.

The EU’s deforestation-free product regulation is a crucial step in addressing the environmental impact of global supply chains.

However, its implementation is now on hold, leaving climate advocates concerned that the delay could slow the momentum on urgently needed climate action.

Check out the latest edition of Supply Chain Magazine and sign up to our global conference series – Procurement and Supply Chain LIVE 2024. 

Supply Chain Digital is a BizClik brand.