DS Smith: Examining the UK's Plastic Packaging Problem
If research from DS Smith is anything to go by, the UK has a pretty major plastic problem on its hands.
The multinational packaging firm's recent Material Change Index exposes systemic challenges in packaging sustainability across UK supermarkets.
Its comprehensive analysis of 1,500 supermarket products across six European countries reveals a stark reality: 51% of food and drink items in UK stores could be safely transitioned to more sustainable packaging alternatives, representing 29.8 billion pieces of potential waste elimination on an annual basis.
"Good progress has been made but there is evidently a great deal more to do," says Miles Roberts, Group CEO at DS Smith.
"We think the government can and should be more demanding of us all — phasing out certain plastics to help create a level playing field that encourages innovation, investment and generates healthy competition to replace plastic."
Plastic dependency
Processed food demonstrates the most pronounced plastic dependency, with 90% of ready meals and meal kits wrapped in plastic.
Staple categories follow closely behind:
- Bread, rice and cereals (89%)
- Dairy (83%)
- Meat and fish (80%)
These figures reveal a complex packaging ecosystem where sustainability intersects with product preservation, shelf life and consumer expectations.
The supply chain implications here are profound, with manufacturers facing significant challenges in balancing food safety, product integrity and environmental responsibility.
Pervasive use of plastic reflects deep-rooted industry practices, where convenience and cost-efficiency have traditionally trumped ecological considerations.
Innovative packaging solutions must now address multiple constraints, including product protection, transportation efficiency and waste reduction.
Comparing markets
The UK emerges as the most plastic-dependent European market, with 70% of food and drink items containing plastic.
This exceeds comparative figures from Spain (67%), Italy and Germany (66%), Poland (62%) and France (59%).
Such disparities accentuate divergent national approaches to packaging sustainability. They also present critical insights for supply chain strategists and suggest significant opportunities for cross-border knowledge transfer and collaborative innovation.
Supply chain leaders must now examine the underlying factors driving these differences – from regulatory environments and waste management infrastructures to consumer attitudes and manufacturer capabilities.
The comparative landscape reveals that sustainable packaging is not merely a national challenge but a complex, interconnected European transformation.
Barriers to sustainable transformation
Despite 98% of food manufacturers and retailers claiming plastic reduction commitments, progress remains constrained by multifaceted challenges.
Cost emerges as the primary barrier, with 40% of survey respondents citing expensive alternative raw materials. Simultaneously, 39% of companies express concerns about potential consumer backlash and market resistance.
DS Smith's survey reveals nuanced consumer attitudes that further complicate supply chain strategy: 72% of industry respondents believe customers would resist paying premium prices for sustainable packaging, while 65% anticipate pushback against convenience sacrifices.
This perceived consumer resistance creates a complex ecosystem where sustainable packaging innovation must simultaneously address environmental imperatives, economic feasibility and consumer expectations.
Miles concludes by highlighting some of his own company's efforts in plastic reduction: "With some of the biggest brands in the world, we estimate that we have been able to replace more than one billion pieces of plastic over the last four years, but it is the tip of the iceberg and we must do more."
Check out the latest edition of Supply Chain Digital and sign up to our global conference series – Procurement and Supply Chain LIVE 2025.
Supply Chain Digital is a BizClik brand.
