May 17, 2020

Lomotek reveals breakthrough African thermoplastics

Supply Chain Digital
Lomotek Polymers
Long Fiber
Freddie Pierce
2 min
New long-fiber reinforced thermoplastics expected to help the South African plastic pallet industry
Lomotek Polymers recently introduced their new range of LOMOTEX Long Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics to a select group of decision makers in the local...

Lomotek Polymers recently introduced their new range of LOMOTEX Long Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics to a select group of decision makers in the local plastics industry.

According to Wouter du Toit, Marketing and Communications Manager of the LOMOLD Group, these long fiber thermoplastics are available in sizes measuring between 10 and 25 millimeters, and are the first of their kind to be introduced to the South African market.   

“These fibers remain long throughout the molding process, tremendously increasing the tensile strength and impact properties of the manufactured product,” Du Toit says. “Once molded, these longer fibers form a grid like structure, virtually unbreakable, making them ideal for pallets, crates and other heavy-duty plastic products that go through rugged cycles.”

The technology employed to develop and manufacture these new generation LOMOTEX fibers was developed in-house by Lomotek Polymers, a plastics supplier to the South African and African market, which develops and markets technology, application and material solutions.  Lomotek Polymers (Pty) Ltd manufactures and sells specialized compounds for the rotomolding, compression and injection molding industry.

“Because the process enables the usage of very high performance materials at relatively low cost, it makes it the ideal for use in the world-renowned LOMOL Pallet – a product that doesn’t just merely match the shape and size of a traditional wooden pallet, but rather incorporates unique features and functionality in a one man lift GMA-specification pallet,” says Du Toit.


Advantages and disadvantages of each type of pallet

Warehouse racking system FAQ

November’s issue of Supply Chain Digital is here!

Tests have shown that the LOMOLD pallet is capable of exceeding the specs of 1,250 kg in dynamic and racking capabilities that a traditional wooden pallet market has benchmarked to be the standard. All of this is due to the strength the longer fibers add to the product properties, while reducing weight to only 8.5 kg (compared to 25-40 kg of a wooden pallet).

Although the LOMOLDpallet will be the first and largest application locally using the LOMOTEX Long Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics, the product will soon be made available to other plastic manufacturers in selected markets.

 “We are excited and proud to finally launch LOMOTEX Long Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics to an appreciative South African market,” Du Toit said. “This product is the result of than 13 years of research and development and will revolutionize the plastic industry throughout the country and the rest of the African continent.”

Click here to download Supply Chain Digital’s iPad app!

Edited by Kevin Scarpati

Share article

Jun 21, 2021

Google and NIST Address Supply Chain Cybersecurity

Elise Leise
3 min
The SolarWinds and Codecov cyberattacks reminded companies that software security poses a critical risk. How do we mitigate it?

As high-level supply chain attacks hit the news, Google and the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have both developed proposals for how to address software supply chain security. This isn’t a new field, unfortunately. Since supply chains are a critical part of business resilience, criminals have no qualms about targeting its software. That’s why identifying, assessing, and mitigating cyber supply chain risks (C-SCRM) is at the top of Google and NIST’s respective agendas. 


High-Profile Supply Chain Attacks 

According to Google, no comprehensive end-to-end framework exists to mitigate threats across the software supply chain. [Yet] ‘there is an urgent need for a solution in the face of the eye-opening, multi-billion-dollar attacks in recent months...some of which could have been prevented or made more difficult’. 


Here are several of the largest cybersecurity failures in recent months: 


  • SolarWinds. Alleged Russian hackers slipped malicious code into a routine software update, which they then used as a Trojan horse for a massive cyberattack. 
  • Codecov. Attackers used automation to collect credentials and raid ‘additional resources’, such as data from other software development vendors. 
  • Malicious attacks on open-source repositories. Out of 1,000 GitHub accounts, more than one in five contained at least one dependency confusion-related misconfiguration. 


As a result of these attacks and Biden’s recent cybersecurity mandate, NIST and Google took action. NIST held a 1,400-person workshop and published 150 papers worth of recommendations from Microsoft, Synopsys, The Linux Foundation, and other software experts; Google will work with popular source, build, and packaging platforms to help companies implement and excel at their SLSA framework


What Are Their Recommendations? 

Here’s a quick recap: NIST has grouped together recommendations to create federal standards; Google has developed an end-to-end framework called Supply Chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA)—pronounced “Salsa”. Both address software procurement and security. 


Now, here’s the slightly more in-depth version: 


  • NIST. The organisation wants more ‘rigorous and predictable’ ways to secure critical software. They suggest that firms use vulnerability disclosure programmes (VDP) and software bills of materials (SBOM), consider simplifying their software and give at least one developer per project security training.
  • Google. The company thinks that SLSA will encompass the source-build-publish software workflow. Essentially, the four-level framework helps businesses make informed choices about the security of the software they use, with SLSA 4 representing an ideal end state. 


If this all sounds very abstract, consider the recent SolarWinds attack. The attacker compromised the build platform, installed an implant, and injected malicious behaviour during each build. According to Google, higher SLSA levels would have required stronger security controls for the build platform, making it more difficult for the attacker to succeed. 


How Do The Proposals Differ? 

As Brian Fox, the co-founder and CTO at Sonatype, sees it, NIST and Google have created proposals that complement each other. ‘The NIST [version] is focused on defining minimum requirements for software sold to the government’, he explained, while Google ‘goes [further] and proposes a specific model for scoring the supply chain. NIST is currently focused on the “what”. Google, along with other industry leaders, is grappling with the “how”’. 


Share article