May 17, 2020

The balance between functionality and ease of integration

Supply Chain Digital
Supply Chain
supply chain news
Logis
Freddie Pierce
4 min
Automation
Written byAnil Kodali(pictured, right), Vice President of Services for TAKE Supply Chain Automation of supply chain processes where it will improve ef...

Written by Anil Kodali (pictured, right), Vice President of Services for TAKE Supply Chain

calin gunn from two blog pieces Anil Kodali.jpg

Automation of supply chain processes where it will improve efficiency or cost effectiveness is critical for today’s global businesses. However, as we have worked with our customers to determine how and when to roll out automation, we advise our customers that it is just as important to balance powerful functionality with the cost and effort of integration. While it might be ideal to implement all available functionality, in some cases the costs in time or money mean a more simplified solution would be the best choice to meet your specific business needs.

The right functionality at the right location and right time

In order to ensure the best return on your investment, it is crucial to understand the outcomes you can expect from any functionality. Very complex integration scenarios may require custom functionality, leading to increased initial costs and higher ongoing support and upgrade costs. In order to approach the best balance between functionality and ease of integration, and therefore, the best ROI, it’s important to consider these factors:

·         Supported functionality: Determine whether the functionality included in available solutions actually fits within the company’s current IT environment. For example, you may be paying for mobile device functionality that you may never use because it is not acceptable from an IT security perspective.

·         Usage (the 80/20 Rule): Often the majority of users (80%) use only a small amount of functionality (20%) and often in different areas.  Before making the commitment to build new functionality with complex integration consider how it will affect the majority of your users. If most actually only need very simple functionality, consider whether it is really worthwhile to roll out additional functionality to the remaining 20%.

·         Global locations: Implementing functionality globally can increase the complexity exponentially as various regions can have different technology infrastructures, regional business units may use different ERPs, and there may be regional differences in workflows and compliance. Consider which locations handle the majority of the processes that will be automated and focus there. Automating those key locations may be sufficient.

·         Platform requirements: Company divisions may be using different hardware platforms or ERP systems. Implementing across all divisions will either require standardization of platforms or increased complexity in the implementation. It may make more sense to bring individual divisions online one at a time to minimize the complexity of each phase of the installation.

·         Training requirements: Each layer of complexity requires additional training, sometimes for users, but primarily for administrators. In an installation with multiple ERPs using tools such as Web Methods or Informatics to align data into data tables that mimic a database before integrating with a supplier collaboration solution, training would be required for admins at each level of integration.

·         Phased implementation: To simplify a complex implementation, break down the process. Develop a pilot installation and test it on a beta site or user base to trouble shoot all integration issues before implementing the entire solution. Another option is to integrate all the functionality on a few systems and expand as needed.

 One of our largest customers has used a variety of these strategies in their implementation. They have multiple divisions split over many geographic areas with a variety of ERPs. They have added a division or two each year over the last five years. At each step in the process, they analyze the ROI expected from adding a new division and have found that the increased savings from the additional automation is entirely worth the complexity of the rollout.

A strategic approach

There may be some processes or instances it never makes monetary sense to automate. In other cases there is point before which automation is not cost effective and a point after which it is. As you develop your automation plan, assess your current processes to set some key milestones:

·         Evaluate the existing volume of work in critical areas, the time and costs associated with handling these areas manually, and determine the point at which the improved efficiency that comes with automating outweighs the costs.

·         Determine areas where accuracy is critical and yet difficult to achieve and the point at which the need for accuracy makes automation worthwhile.

·         Review regulatory requirements and compliance risks to determine the point at which potential fines and fees for mistakes outweigh the costs of automating.

Assessing your supply chain and the balance you must strike between the available functionality and the complexity and costs associated is not a one-time project. What might be “nice to have” functionality today could easily become “must have” tomorrow. Keeping the key milestones you have established in view will help ensure that you are making the right decisions at the right time.

Our eBook, 5 Key Criteria for Setting the Right Level of Supply Chain Collaboration, provides great pointers for analyzing your supply chain’s functionality and needs. It’s a great first step to finding balance between functionality and ease of integration for your company.

Share article

Jun 9, 2021

Biden establishes Supply Chain Disruptions Task Force

supplychain
Supplychainriskmanagement
Procurement
Biden
3 min
US government lays out plans for supply chain transformation following results of the supply chain review ordered by President Biden in February

The US government is to establish a new body with the express purpose of addressing imbalances and other supply chain concerns highlighted in a review of the sector, ordered by President Joe Biden shortly after his inauguration. 

The Supply Chain Disruptions Task Force will “focus on areas where a mismatch between supply and demand has been evident,” the White House said. The division will be headed up by the Secretaries of Commerce, Transportation, and Agriculture, and will focus on housing construction, transportation, agriculture and food, and semiconductors - a drastic shortage of which has hit some of the US economy’s biggest industries in consumer technology and vehicle manufacturing. 

“The Task Force will bring the full capacity of the federal government to address near-term supply/demand mismatches. It will convene stakeholders to diagnose problems and surface solutions - large and small, public or private - that could help alleviate bottlenecks and supply constraints,” the White House said. 

In late February, President Biden ordered a 100 day review of the supply chain across the key areas of medicine, raw materials and agriculture, the findings of which were released this week. While the COVID-19 health crisis had a deleterious effect on the nation’s supply chain, the published assessment of findings says the root cause runs much deeper. The review concludes that “decades of underinvestment”, alongside public policy choices that favour quarterly results and short-term solutions, have left the system “fragile”. 

In response, the administration aims to address four key issues head on, strengthening its position in health and medicine, sustainable and alternative energy, critical mineral mining and processing, and computer chips. 

Support domestic production of critical medicines

 

  • A syndicate of public and private entities will jointly work towards manufacturing and onshoring of essential medical suppliers, beginning with a list of 50-100 “critical drugs” defined by the Food and Drug Administration. 
  • The consortium will be led by the Department of Health and Human Services, which will commit an initial $60m towards the development of a “novel platform technologies to increase domestic manufacturing capacity for API”. 
  • The aim is to increase domestic production and reduce the reliance upon global supply chains, particularly with regards to medications in short supply.


Secure an end-to-end domestic supply chain for advanced batteries

 

  • The Department of Energy will publish a ‘National Blueprint for Lithium Batteries’, beginning a 10 year plan to "develop a domestic lithium battery supply chain that combats the climate crisis by creating good-paying clean energy jobs across America”. 
  • The effort will leverage billions in funding “to finance key strategic areas of development and fill deficits in the domestic supply chain capacity”. 


Invest in sustainable domestic and international production and processing of critical minerals

 

  • An interdepartmental group will be established by the Department of Interior to identify sites where critical minerals can be produced and processed within US borders. It will collaborate with businesses, states, tribal nations and stockholders to “expand sustainable, responsible critical minerals production and processing in the United States”. 
  • The group will also identify where regulations may need to be updated to ensure new mining and processing “meets strong standards”.


Partner with industry, allies, and partners to address semiconductor shortages

 

  • The Department of Commerce will increase its partnership with industry to support further investment in R&D and production of semiconductor chips. The White House says its aim will be to “facilitate information flow between semiconductor producers and suppliers and end-users”, improving transparency and data sharing. 
  • Enhanced relationships with foreign allies, including Japan and South Korea will also be strengthened with the express proposed of increasing chip output, promoting further investment in the sector and “to promote fair semiconductor chip allocations”. 
     

Share article