ASOS Warehouse Fire Reveals the Costs of Supply Chain Risk

By Admin
Share
A recent distribution centre fire on the premises belonging to global online fast-fashion and beauty retailer, ASOS, has brought to light many of the ri...

A recent distribution centre fire on the premises belonging to global online fast-fashion and beauty retailer, ASOS, has brought to light many of the risks to which modern supply chains are exposed.

ASOS keeps 70 percent of its stock in Barnsley, England and it is believed that the fire could have affected more than $50 million of inventory.

The facility is over 600,000 square feet and the fire, which police believe was deliberately set, spread to four floors. Although the website is up and running after being disrupted this weekend, ASOS’s share price fell by two percent before bouncing back, proving just how much disaster can affect a company.

John Manners-Bell, CEO of Transport Intelligence and author of the recently published book, Supply Chain Risk: Understanding Emerging Threats to Global Supply Chains, commented: “One of the problems of operating global distribution centres is the concentration of risk in one location.

“Centralisation of logistics operations makes sense on an operational basis in terms of keeping stock levels low and reducing redundancy. However if you start costing in external risks such as fires, floods and security issues, then suddenly it doesn’t look so smart.

“As it is very difficult to quantify the financial cost of ‘Black Swan’ events, many companies pretend that the risks don’t exist. Although ASOS had insurance and the disaster could have been a lot worse, there will still be implications for the retailer in terms of customer service and reputation.”

Manners-Bell added: “To get back up and running so quickly, ASOS obviously had exceptional contingency plans in place, no doubt helped by an earlier experience when its previous distribution centre in the UK was badly damaged by an oil depot blast.

“However this further disaster demonstrates the systemic fragility of many global supply chains and perhaps suggests that it would be sensible to spread risk over a number of locations, despite an increase in internal supply chain costs.”

In Supply Chain Risk, Manners-Bell assesses the various sources of external threat to the supply chain, including environmental, geopolitical, economic and technological, and describes how to deal with them strategically.

“It’s not about preparing your supply chain for a known threat, it’s about making it resilient against all risks,” he said. “This requires a great deal of scenario planning; putting processes in place, implementing the technology to sense and respond to events as they happen. It has to go to the very core of a company’s supply chain strategy.” 

Share

Featured Articles

SAVE THE DATE – P&SC LIVE: Scope 3 2025

Dive into the future of procurement and sustainability at the groundbreaking Procureemnt & Supply Chain LIVE: Scope 3 Event 5 and 6 March 2025

SAVE THE DATE – Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE Chicago 2025

Supply Chain Digital Magazine announces its first dedicated Supply Chain LIVE Event in Chicago on 4 and 5 June 2025

How Natural Disasters Expose Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

Flooding from Hurricane Helene has halted ultra-pure quartz mining in North Carolina, a critical component in the global semiconductor supply chain

US Port Strikes Suspended: Will Supply Chains Stabilise?

Operations

Why the EU has Delayed the Deforestation-Free Supply Mandate

Sustainability

What Does US Port Strike Mean for Global Supply Chains?

Operations