Argon & Co: Trump Tariffs to Trigger 'Resilience by Design'

Share
Rob Carlisle, Head of Logistics at Argon & Co
Rob Carlisle, Head of Logistics at Argon & Co, discusses the long-term, global implications of President-elect Donald Trump's potential trade tariffs

Donald Trump’s re-election last week has left the global logistics industry up in the air, with the returning President weighing up tariffs of 10-20% on all imports arriving in the US and 60-100% on Chinese imports.

Many retailers and manufacturing companies have been scrambling to ‘front load’ shipments to the US before tariffs are imposed.

Here, Rob Carlisle, Head of Logistics at Argon & Co, discusses the long-term, global implications of this controversial policy. 

What is President-elect Trump reportedly weighing up when it comes to tariffs?

If we take Trump’s campaign rhetoric at face value, the US may impose tariffs at levels unseen since the 1930s, having a seismic impact on trade relations as we know them today. During his first term, Trump often used the threat of tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations, but didn’t always follow through.

President-elect Donald Trump

However, current reports suggest his administration could be considering tariffs of 10-20% on all imports and a staggering 60% on goods from China. This will largely target goods and manufacturing, rather than services. Such measures would likely hit electronics, apparel and toys hardest – sectors heavily reliant on Chinese manufacturing.

From a sustainability perspective, Trump’s proposed tariffs could be short-sighted. In his previous administration, it is possible that the tariffs he imposed intending to curb China’s dominance actually backfired, inadvertently enabling China to take a leadership position in technologies critical for the green transition. According to the International Energy Agency, China currently controls more than 80% of the global solar value chain. If these tariffs go ahead, they could further cement China’s position in green technology while increasing costs for U.S. manufacturers and consumers.

How are retailers and manufacturers responding to these anticipated tariffs?

At this stage, the majority of retailers are still evaluating their options and modelling scenarios to prepare for potential tariff impacts. The range of options is broad but could involve moving operations. This will likely accelerate a trend that has started to establish in recent years, with product flows being broken up into three ‘global zones’ – the Americas, Europe and APAC – to mitigate risks associated with tariffs. The new tariffs will likely speed up this trend with companies managing their supply strategies in a regional network.

Manufacturers may hedge risks by increasing inventory in strategic areas. This marks a shift away from a true just-in-time inventory model, as companies prioritise resilience over efficiency to counteract ongoing global disruptions. Onshoring or relocating manufacturing to regions with lower tariff exposure is another likely strategy, and we may see Chinese firms potentially acquiring Mexican businesses to sidestep tariffs in the States.

Some firms might also stockpile resources with high anticipated tariffs, while others may explore ways to automate and cut costs in their manufacturing base. While much is still to be firmed up surrounding Trump’s tariffs, firms should look to tread a careful balancing act of cost, efficiency and resilience.

Youtube Placeholder

Could a trade war be looming as a result of Trump's love of tariffs?

Trade war is quite a bold term – but it’s certainly possible. The policy and response from other countries could take many forms. During Trump’s first term, we saw ‘tit-for-tat’ responses from China and the EU and this pattern will likely escalate further if he follows through on his campaign promises.

The scope of a trade war largely depends on how other nations respond. While superpowers like China may engage directly, it looks unlikely that smaller countries would enter into a tariff war with the US and are more likely to mitigate exposure to the impacts.

For example, countries reliant on US energy exports might shift to alternative sources, as China has done in its long-term pursuit of energy independence. Can the US really afford the consequences of sustained trade conflicts? The answer may not just reshape its economy but redefine its role on the global stage.

Which sectors would be hardest hit by Trump's threatened tariffs on China? 

Consumer goods and retail are most obviously in the firing line. However, modern supply chains are incredibly complex, with both components and finished goods being sourced from all four corners of the world. The ripple effects could mean that sectors like pharmaceuticals and industrials could also feel the impact, depending on which direction the tariffs go.

Ironically, the American powerhouse of life sciences might suffer unexpected consequences. While the US excels in large-scale drug manufacture, with exports to other countries, many secondary and tertiary materials needed to pack and produce these products – such as syringes, lab equipment and packaging – are made in China. Establishing local alternatives takes time and could lead to supply disruptions.

Automotive manufacturing is another vulnerable sector, as it often relies on complex, cross-border supply chains. Even industries where the US has competitive capabilities, like pharmaceuticals and cars, could experience increased costs and logistical challenges as a result of the proposed tariffs.

Donald Trump’s re-election has left the global logistics industry in a state of limbo

How can firms embed resilience into their supply chains before disruption strikes?

Firms should look to adopt a ‘resilience by design’ approach – assessing strategic networks and creating playbooks for different scenarios that arise. Embedding resilience requires a proactive, multi-layered strategy.

One step that firms could explore is opening new facilities in non-tariff regions or relocating logistics hubs around less disrupted zones. They could also evaluate alternative sourcing models, keeping in mind that these too could be disrupted again at a later date. If Plan A fails, firms can have contingencies for multiple scenarios – and Plans B, C and D to fall back on.

It’s equally important to understand the tier 2, 3 and even 4 of raw material supply to identify where cross-border tariffs will likely impact sourcing. This helps to spot any vulnerabilities so firms can build inventory buffers for critical raw materials in the mid-term. In the longer term, firms should be prepared for the loss of some trade. They should look to identify alternative customers from other markets and feed this into their long-term strategy and planning.

Leveraging suppliers’ expertise and know-how can help firms stay one step ahead. Suppliers often have valuable insights from working with multiple customers facing similar challenges. Transparent relationships help create trust and flexibility, allowing for quicker pivots when disruptions arise.


Explore the latest edition of Supply Chain Digital and be part of the conversation at our global conference series, Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE.

Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today. 


Supply Chain Digital is a BizClik brand. 

Share

Featured Articles

The Panama Canal and its Crucial Role in the EV Supply Chain

Supply Chain Digital examines the Panama Canal's vital role in the EV supply chain amid geopolitical tension and global trade volatility

Q&A: JP Lauer at GEP Europe Tour 2025, Amsterdam

Supply Chain Digital caught up with JP Lauer, Vice President Consulting at GEP, during the first leg of the GEP Europe Tour 2025 in Amsterdam

Blue Yonder: Optimising Cold Chain Operations for RealCold

RealCold, a key player in cold chain services, is deploying Blue Yonder’s Warehouse Management solution to digitally transform its operations

This Week's Top Five Stories in Supply Chain

Digital Supply Chain

Nestlé and sennder's Bid to Decarbonise Logistics

Logistics

What Does Rachel Reeves Speech Mean for Supply Chain?

Operations