May 17, 2020

Why your supply chain may not be as ethical as you think

Slavery
Slavery Footprint
Made in a Free World
conflict m
Freddie Pierce
5 min
The minerals fund war in the Democratic Republic of Congo
Follow @Ella_Copeland Top companies are becoming more distanced from their supply chain as low overseas costs promote globalisation and services are ou...

Top companies are becoming more distanced from their supply chain as low overseas costs promote globalisation and services are outsourced. As a consequence, it has become harder for businesses to keep track of their purchasing where those at the top have little idea of the conditions at the bottom.

Some key materials used in a range of products around the world are sourced in terrible circumstances, using forced labour. As consumers become aware of these issues, companies are getting involved in ‘cleaning up’ their supply chains.

Three problem materials which are commonly used in electrical devices are Tin, Tungsten and Tantalum used in tablets and smartphones. Sourced predominantly from Congo, these materials are often mined by exploited men, women and children who suffer at the hands of rebel groups.

 

The Enough Project

NGO’s and consumers have made efforts to raise awareness of the issues surrounding these ‘Conflict minerals’ in the last few years.  Sasha Lezhnev is part of the Enough Project, a pressure group who hope to end genocide and crimes against humanity. The Enough Project has recently listed companies in accordance to their efforts to address the working conditions of miners.

“We have a baseline of information see if a company is making effort to remove conflict minerals. There are some companies which refuse to engage with us like Nintendo- they don’t get a zero because they didn’t participate with us, they got a zero because we know they don’t participate with the Conflict Free Smelter Program, the Public Private Alliance, the OECD and other efforts to help address the issue,” said Lezhnev.

The issue has gained much more momentum in the last few months, following new legislation by the White House in August, which requires manufacturers to disclose where they buy conflict metals from.

“A company can make substantial progress in a year if it really shows some effort. If Tylenol has a fault in its drug that is causing a health problem to consumers then it will make an immediate change to its supply chain, but for these human rights issues when you’re really affecting human lives at the end of the supply chain, companies are very slow to react.”

“Some companies that have proven that progress is possible like Intel, Apple, Motorola and HP, who have taken stronger lines on the issues; tracking the number of smelters they are using and setting up an audit programme for them. These are things that they were able to do in a year.”

 

Made in a Free World

Slavery Footprint is another NGO aiming to eradicate forced labour. They recently launched Made in a Free World (MIAFW), an initiative to help businesses remove slavery from their supply chains. Unveiled at the Clinton Global Initiative, MIAFW applies accreditation to companies who are tackling slavery in the Supply Chain. This initiative has the backing of the US government, which has pledged to begin cleaning up its own procurement system.

“It’s not just a glut of companies but a depth. It’s a too early to put a number on as we’re still looking at the fact that commodities are dispersed across so many different companies’ supply chains. When you get down to the raw materials and commodities level it becomes murky, that’s where we’re seeing forced labour and slavery. It is very much at the agricultural and the extractives part of the supply chain, but also happens further up in shipping and production,” said Justin Dillon, CEO and Founder of Slavery Footprint.

Dillon is working with a number of Fortune 500 companies to develop solutions and methodologies to get rid of slavery in the supply chain and are training analysts to help tackle the problem.

“We’ve been able to start building an analytical model around the likelihood of forced labour, identifying hot spots based on any company’s supply chain. We can then empirically determine the likelihood of forced labour within the products we consume,” he said.

Dillon hopes that by applying pressure to the top levels of the supply chain, top companies can encourage reform amongst the lower tiers.

“If a company signed up today, their visibility and understanding is going to increase 200 percent, because most companies just don’t know. Their code of conduct will then be changed. Everyone that does business with them will know that removing slavery is a priority and purchasing will have this as part of the value proposition. Past one year we’d like companies to see some of their suppliers with the same accreditation by MIAFW and begin to prefer them over others,” he explained.

 

How to tackle the issue

So long as your procurement system is clear, the initial implementation process is not an expensive one. Similar to an analytics system, all it takes is supply chain visibility to establish areas of concerns. Dillon argues that the risk mitigation process makes the small cost worthwhile.

“We’ve moved past an era where people shrug their shoulders and say ‘well that’s globalisation’. We’re seeing that whilst the profits from slave labour at the bottom of the supply chain don’t reach the top, the risks do. If you do not know where your cotton or tin is coming from, the fact that you don’t is worthy of note, investigation and action. It’s a lot more expensive to try and explain why you haven’t addressed this than it will be to get involved now.”

He hopes that eventually implementing ethical procurement practices will pay dividends to the companies that get involved early.

“We’d love to see the market start to shift where those companies who have stepped up to MIAFW have started trading better around preferential purchasing from suppliers that are demonstrating standards. We think when we get that we are going to start seeing the grid of pressure working and start helping people. I hope it will take less than five years to see MIAFW become a standard which is valuable in not only the C2B but also the B2B space.”

To get advice on how to make sure your supply chain is ethical, contact the Enough Project or Slavery Footprint. 

Share article

Jun 16, 2021

EU and US agree end to Airbus-Boeing supply chain tariffs

supplychain
Boeing
Airbus
tariffs
3 min
Supply chains embroiled in Airbus-Boeing dispute will no longer be impacted by $11.5bn tariffs imposed on food and beverage, aircraft and tobacco

The EU and US have agreed to resolve a 17-year dispute over aircraft subsidies, suspending tariffs on billions of dollars' worth of goods that have plagued procurement leaders on both sides of the Atlantic. 

Under an agreement reached by European Commission Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis and US Trade Representative Katherine Tai on Tuesday, the tariffs will be halted for a period of at least five years. 

It will bring an end to punitive and disruptive levies on supply chains that have little to do with the argument, which became embroiled in the trade battle. Businesses on both sides of the dispute have been hit with more than $3.3bn in duties since they were first imposed by the US in October 2019, according the EC. 

The US imposed charges on goods upto $7.5bn in response to a World Trade Organisation ruling that judged the EU’s support of Airbus, its biggest aircraft manufacturer, unlawful. A year later in November 2020, the EU hit back. The WTO found the US had violated trade rules in its favourable treatment of Boeing, and was hit with EU duties worth $4bn. 

In all the tariffs affected $11.5bn worth of goods, including French cheese, Scotch whisky, aircraft and machinery in Europe, and sugarcane products, handbags and tobacco in America. Procurement leaders on both sides of the fence were forced to wrestle with tariffs of 15% on aircraft and components, and 25% on non-aircraft related products. 

Boeing-Airbus dispute by the numbers  

  • The dispute began in 2004
  • Tariffs suspended for 5 years 
  • $11.5bn worth of goods affected by tariffs
  • $3.3bn in duties paid by businesses to date 
  • 15% levy on aircraft and 25% on non-aircraft goods suspended

Both sides welcome end to tariffs 

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen branded the truce a “major step” in ending what is the longest running dispute in WTO history. It began in 2004.

“I am happy to see that after intensive work between the European Commission and the US administration, our transatlantic partnership is on its way to reaching cruising speed. This shows the new spirit of cooperation between the EU and the US and that we can solve the other issues to our mutual benefit,” she added.

Both aircraft manufacturers have welcomed the news. Airbus said in a statement that it will hopefully bring to an end the “lose-lose tariffs” that are affecting industries already facing “many challenges”. Boeing added that it will “fully support the U.S. Government’s efforts to ensure that the principles in this understanding are respected”. 

The US aerospace firm added: "The understanding reached today commits the EU to addressing launch aid, and leaves in place the necessary rules to ensure that the EU and United States live up to that commitment, without requiring further WTO action."

This week’s decision expands upon a short-term tariff truce announced in March this year. The EC says it will work closely with the US to try and further resolve the dispute, establishing a Working Group on Large Civil Aircraft led by each side’s trade minister.

Airbus last month signalled to suppliers that post-pandemic recovery was on the horizon, telling them to scale up to meet a return to pre-COVID manufacturing levels. “The aviation sector is beginning to recover from the COVID-19 crisis,” said Airbus chief executive Guillaume Faury, adding that suppliers should prepare for a period of intensive production “when market conditions call for it.”

Share article