Is Canada Becoming a Critical Minerals Supply Chain Player?

As global supply chains face mounting pressure to reduce dependency on single-source suppliers, Canada's critical minerals sector presents a compelling opportunity to reshape North American sourcing strategies.

The country's geological advantages could position it as a strategic supply chain partner for western nations seeking to diversify their mineral procurement networks. However, according to the Royal Bank of Canada, significant capital investment gaps threaten to limit Canada's ability to meet this demand.

If Canada can mobilise sufficient investment, it could provide western manufacturers with alternative sourcing routes that reduce supply chain vulnerability while supporting regional economic development.

The Royal Bank of Canada's analysis examines the infrastructure, investment and strategic partnerships required to transform Canada's geological potential into reliable supply chain capacity.

Understanding critical minerals demand

Critical minerals represent essential inputs for manufacturing processes that governments have identified as strategically important. Individual countries maintain different classifications based on their industrial priorities, though certain materials appear consistently across international lists.

Copper, lithium, cobalt and nickel feature prominently due to their applications across multiple supply chains. The shift towards electric vehicle production has created substantial upstream demand for lithium, while renewable energy infrastructure development has altered procurement patterns for numerous materials.

According to the International Energy Agency, global investment in critical minerals extraction and processing could reach from US$500bn to US$600bn by 2040, representing a two to threefold increase in sector capitalisation. This expansion reflects changing supply chain requirements across electric vehicles, clean energy infrastructure, defence, manufacturing and electronics sectors.

The Royal Bank of Canada notes that Canada's limited access to patient, risk-tolerant capital could constrain its ability to capture this supply chain opportunity.

All sustainability, net zero and sustainable procurement leaders should attend:

• Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE: The Net Zero Summit - QEII Centre, London, March 4-5
• Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE: The US Summit - Navy Pier, Chicago, April 21-22

Co-located with Sustainability LIVE, these events brings together CPOs, CSCO, CSOs, ESG leaders and senior decision-makers at a moment when sustainability, supply chains and commercial performance are increasingly interconnected.

Tickets can be booked online today for The Net Zero Summit and The US Summit. Group discounts available.

Supply chain positioning challenges

Despite favourable geology, Canada currently accounts for only 2% of global supply for six core metals. The Canadian government suggests this could grow to 14% by 2040, though this depends on the country's capacity to fund projects and prioritise supply chain development.

Quebec and Ontario contain high-grade lithium belts and graphite deposits that could support battery manufacturing supply chains. Manitoba's nickel resources and British Columbia's copper reserves offer potential alternatives to existing procurement routes. Rare earth element deposits across Newfoundland, Labrador and other regions could address supply chain vulnerabilities in advanced manufacturing and defence sectors.

However, inadequate capitalisation threatens to prevent these resources from reaching commercial supply chains:

• Historical capital allocation shows only 11% of Canada's mining investment between 2000 and 2025 directed towards critical minerals development. Gold and precious metals attracted 70% of capital during this period. Australia allocated twice as much capital to critical materials between 2000 and 2025.
• Limited domestic diversification means only 19% of Canada's publicly listed S&P/TSX Composite mining firms operate as diversified miners.
• Processing capacity deficits create downstream bottlenecks. China controls 70% of global refining capacity for 19 out of 20 critical minerals, while Canada operates only one active copper smelter/refinery – Glencore's Horne Smelter.

Building integrated supply corridors

Canadian companies require scaled capital deployment across the entire value chain to establish viable supply routes. The Canada Growth Fund has made three mineral investments, including to Thompson Nickel Mines in Manitoba, and has supported Quebec's Nouveau Monde Graphite facility.

While these investments demonstrate government commitment, additional capital remains necessary to achieve meaningful supply chain capacity.

Developing mineral corridors with shared processing infrastructure could address multiple constraints simultaneously. Clustered lithium projects could support regional refining hubs that reduce transportation costs and processing bottlenecks.

Integrated regional approaches could improve project bankability while creating more resilient supply chains through geographic concentration of processing capabilities.

Canada could address its capital requirements by deepening supply chain integration with the United States. Current US government investment in defence and industrial supply chains creates opportunities for Canadian suppliers to secure long-term procurement relationships.

However, maintaining supply chain resilience requires diversification beyond bilateral arrangements. Establishing supply agreements with European and Asian partners could provide Canadian producers with multiple demand sources while offering international buyers alternative procurement routes.