May 17, 2020

UN sustainability plan on right track but no quick fix

un sustainability
ban ki moon
Supply Chain
Freddie Pierce
4 min
Written by Nick Murry,Chief Sustainability Officer at global supply chain sustainability site Ecodesk UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moons speechlast mon...

Written by Nick Murry, Chief Sustainability Officer at global supply chain sustainability site Ecodesk

Nick Murry.JPG

UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon’s speech last month promised a sustainability framework for global business. The aim, he said, is to address the pivotal role of business in helping to make the UN’s global vision of sustainable development a reality. So can ‘global business’ rise to the challenge? Interestingly, Accenture found that 1000 CEOs from companies around the world backed the UN roadmap, which aims to drive corporate action on sustainable development once the 2015 deadline for achieving the Millennium Development Goals has passed.

Plenty of commitment to taking action then – good news indeed – and no disagreement that business needs a sustainability framework driven by an independent global organisation, such as the UN. But any framework will need businesses to buy into it with action, not just rhetoric, if it is to have  any real and lasting effect. And for the majority of large organisations, this doesn’t mean reporting yet more data on sustainability initiatives and in-house programmes, but implies actively opening up supply chains and mapping key sustainability performance data. Ideally with even the smallest of suppliers in the remotest of regions. Impossible?

A few weeks ago the annual UN Global Compact Sustainability report supported this idea but revealed that weakness in supply chain sustainability strategies among large companies is resulting in a disparity between what is promised and the results that are actually produced. Although the majority of companies have set expectations of their suppliers - sustainable procurement policies, codes of conduct and the like - compliance is often not tracked and suppliers are not generally given a great deal of help.

The report acknowledged that making sustainability a requirement in the supply chain isn’t ‘an easy or straight forward process’; citing that according to 54 per cent of large companies surveyed ‘extending corporate sustainability strategy through the supply chain’ is the number one factor blocking advancement. Notably, only 26 per cent of SMEs ranked this as the biggest barrier, behind financial factors and lack of relevant knowledge.

for un sustainability article.JPG

This disconnect between large corporations and SMEs is one area in which the UN should focus its energies, working with governments who are trying to introduce mandatory measures and enabling companies to reach out more effectively to even the remotest supplier. It’s a tough ask. But if those 1000 CEOs are serious about the importance of this agenda, it becomes a matter of how, not why, and finding the means of engaging and driving sustainability in the supply chain becomes the challenge.

So where are we in practical terms? According to the UN report, the percentage of companies mandating supplier adherence to sustainability commitments has doubled to over 13 per cent since 2008. However, the effect of this is only just beginning to be felt in terms of tangible results. It’s a slow burn but, despite global recession, things are moving steadily in the right direction.

With greater awareness and an UN-sanctioned framework within which to work, the hope is that there will be more fluidity of data within supply chains. SME suppliers will hopefully elevate transparent sustainability disclosure closer to the top of their agendas, seeing it as essential to customer relations and long term business success, not as just another requirement, and time-consuming survey to complete.

for un sustainability article2.JPG

However, sustainable supply chain projects are not quick fixes. They need to be an intrinsic part of an organisation’s sustainability agenda and appropriately funded, if the potentially extensive benefits are to be realised.  Organisations first need to be clear about their objectives and strategy, and then define what’s required in terms of data collection and analysis. Data needs to be converted into relevant information and used to support decision making that will drive business value.

It’s also important not to put the financial onus on suppliers, who are bound to be less inclined to respond to data requests if they have to pay for ‘the privilege’. Better to have a free point of entry for basic information that is readily available and open to scrutiny from existing and potential stakeholders.

So is trade the financial carrot that will ultimately drive sustainability? It’s certainly necessary - economic progress depends upon it - but it isn’t sufficient. For issues like climate change that require a strong and urgent response, the ‘business case’ can only take us so far. Combined with an effective UN framework (at the international level) and strong government regulation (at the national level), however, business could be part of a perfect storm that precedes the emergence of a sustainable economy.

Ultimately, this will only happen if companies start to ‘mandate’ disclosure on key issues and work together with their supply chains in taking the necessary action. Only then will high level commitments to sustainability, and their associated policies and strategies, have the potential to cause a ‘ripple effect’ that will change corporate culture and result in truly sustainable business.

Definition – what is supply chain sustainability?

A growing issue facing businesses on how non-financial factors - energy and material resource consumption, environmental and social impacts - in the supply chain, affect business efficiency, risk and opportunity.  Sustainability in the supply chain is increasingly seen among senior executives as essential to delivering long-term profitability. 

Share article

Jun 21, 2021

Elon Musk's Boring Co. planning wider tunnels for freight

2 min
Elon Musk’s tunnelling firm plans underground freight tunnels with shipping containers moved on “battery-powered freight carriers”, according to reports

Elon Musk’s drilling outfit The Boring Company could be shifting its focus towards subterranean freight and logistics solutions, according to reports. 

A Boring Co. pitch deck seen and shared by Bloomberg depicts plans to construct wider tunnels designed to accommodate shipping containers. 

Founded by Tesla CEO Musk in 2016, the company initially stated its mission was to offer safer, faster point-to-point transport for people, particularly in cities plagued by traffic congestion. It also planned longer tunnels to ferry passengers between popular destinations across the US. 

The Boring Co. completed its first commercial project earlier this year in April. The 1.7m tunnel system is designed to move professionals between convention centres in Las Vegas using Tesla EVs. It says the Las Vegas Convention Centre Loop can cut travel time between venues from 45 minutes to just two. 


Boring Co.'s new freight tunnels

The Boring Co.'s new tunnel designs would allow freight to be transported on purpose built platforms, labelled as “battery-powered freight carriers”. The document shows that, though the containers could technically fit within its current 12-foot tunnels, wider tunnels would be more efficient. Designs for a new tunnel, 21 feet in diameter, show that they can comfortably accommodate two containers side-by-side, with a one-foot gap between them.

The Boring Co.’s new drilling machine, dubbed Prufrock, can tunnel at a rate of one mile per week, which is six times faster than its previous machine, and is designed to ‘porpoise’ - mimicking the marine animal by ‘diving’ below ground and reemerging once the tunnel is complete. 

Tesla’s supply chain woes 

Tesla is facing its own supply chain and logistic issues. The EV manufacturer has raised the price of its vehicles, with CEO Musk confirming the incremental hike was a result of “major supply chain pressure”. Musk replied to a disgruntled Twitter user, confused as to why prices were rising while features were being removed from the cars, saying the “raw materials especially” were a big issue. 

Elon Musk Tweet

Car manufacturing continues to be one of the industries hit hardest by a global shortage in semiconductor chips. While China’s chip manufacturing levels hit an all-time high in May, and the US is proposing a 25% tax credit for chip manufacturers, demand still outstrips supply. Automakers including Volkswagen and Audi have again said they expect reduced vehicle output in the next quarter due to a lack of semiconductors, with more factory downtime likely

Top Image credit: The Boring Company / @boringcompany

Share article