May 17, 2020

How logistics assessment improves business performance, by Rocket Consulting

Supply Chain Digital
Supply Chain
supply chain news
Freddie Pierce
4 min
Hit the road
Written byJim Lodwick(pictured),Transport and logistics consultant atRocket Consulting Competitive advantage is business critical in todays economic e...

Written by Jim Lodwick (pictured), Transport and logistics consultant at Rocket Consulting 

Jim Lodwick rocket consulting.jpg

Competitive advantage is business critical in today’s economic environment, where every organisation competes against multiple supply sources.

The logistics function is a fundamental element of an organisation’s supply chain process, but in-depth assessment often reveals that it is not streamlined to run at optimum efficiency.  This can leave money on the table - statistical research from the Aberdeen Group shows that reducing logistics costs by 5 percent is typically equivalent to a 30 percent increase in sales turnover – andhave an unnecessary impact on other business units.   Resolving these issues can appear to require pursuing an unnecessary level of detail on a function that is not always part of the organisation’s core competence, but companies cannot afford to leave such benefits untapped.

So how can an enterprise ensure that the transport and logistics function is not the weak link in its supply chain?

Understanding complex costs

It is essential to acknowledge that distribution companies tendering for business must factor numerous complexities into their rates.  However, because there is no consistency, it is difficult for businesses selecting a supplier to compare like-with-like.  In addition, rates are usually reported as a ‘standard fee ’, which does not provide a breakdown of the component cost factors.

But making informed decisions requires insight and visibility.  Understanding where the uncertainties lie underpins the drive for better efficiency.  To that end, the following are key points to be considered when agreeing a contract with a logistics provider:

1.            Fuel source

The delivery price quoted accounts for costs including the driver, the fuel, and vehicle insurance and maintenance – all of which can vary widely. Figures show that 30 to 40 percent of total operational cost for an articulated vehicle is fuel for example (Source: Freight Transport Association: Manager's Guide to Distribution Costs - July 2013 Main Report), and that such a vehicle uses a gallon to travel between six and ten miles (depending on how efficiently a vehicle is driven and the route taken). Whether the transporter sources fuel from the commercial forecourt or a bunker site will also make a significant difference to the overall cost, so in addition to selecting a supplier, a decision as to whether they should use their own or third party fleet can also take place.

2.            Empty journeys

Variations in prices quoted are also magnified when it comes to ‘dead mileage’.  Many vehicles are dispatched daily from a region and travel to the same delivery points, but return empty or partially loaded.  Statistics also show that, on average, vehicles only carry 60 percent of their maximum weight load (Source: Freight Transport Association: The Logistics Report 2013).  Even the argument that that vehicles are physically full before they reach their weight limits is not persuasive; research shows that this only occurs 60 to 70 percent of the time, further endorsing the utilisation problem and suggesting that commercial fleets are used efficiently on outbound legs but less so on the return journey.

3.            Stationery vehicles 

The time that a vehicle stands unused in a yard or sits on a bay waiting to be loaded or unloaded compounds delivery costs accordingly. Figures show that on average vehicles spend up to 28percent of the time stationery (Source: Department of Transport food supply chain statistics).  Often, whilst core fleet is under-utilised or idle, extra fleet needs to be drafted in to meet delivery obligations.  (When the pressure is on to complete an impending customer delivery, to ensure a quick decision the key principles of procurement are often put to one side, resulting in an increase in the associated business risks and costs).

4.            Non-financial essentials

Cost is one element, but the total cost of doing business also requires an assessment from the qualitative perspective.  Does the service provider have the necessary level of goods in transit insurance in place, along with appropriate clauses for liability, for example?  What vehicle preparation is required before the load can begin?  And does the provider guarantee that drivers will have enough driving time to complete all the deliveries? 

Transport is usually the only time at which the customer physically interacts with the company.  Considerations should therefore include whether the delivery will be made on time, and if the appearance of the driver and vehicle reflect the supplier’s brand to ensure the optimum customer experience. 

Gathering data

Optimising logistics contracts requires in-depth knowledge of the carrier industry.  Knowing a transport company that would benefit from loading up on a return journey from a specific location, rather than returning to the depot empty, for example, is beneficial to both the supplier and transporter.

Supply chain specialists are usually best-placed to advise on the specifics, but companies can start the process by ensuring that strategic metrics are available and visible to highlight issues within the operation of commercial delivery fleets.  (These will also ensure that focus is maintained internally to drive continuous improvement, and can be combined with monthly management reports to provide invaluable explanations for previously unaccounted for variations).

There is no quick fix for operating an effective and efficient logistics function.  But assessment of the variables outlined above is the first step to achieving this business-critical goal.

Share article

Jun 21, 2021

Elon Musk's Boring Co. planning wider tunnels for freight

2 min
Elon Musk’s tunnelling firm plans underground freight tunnels with shipping containers moved on “battery-powered freight carriers”, according to reports

Elon Musk’s drilling outfit The Boring Company could be shifting its focus towards subterranean freight and logistics solutions, according to reports. 

A Boring Co. pitch deck seen and shared by Bloomberg depicts plans to construct wider tunnels designed to accommodate shipping containers. 

Founded by Tesla CEO Musk in 2016, the company initially stated its mission was to offer safer, faster point-to-point transport for people, particularly in cities plagued by traffic congestion. It also planned longer tunnels to ferry passengers between popular destinations across the US. 

The Boring Co. completed its first commercial project earlier this year in April. The 1.7m tunnel system is designed to move professionals between convention centres in Las Vegas using Tesla EVs. It says the Las Vegas Convention Centre Loop can cut travel time between venues from 45 minutes to just two. 


Boring Co.'s new freight tunnels

The Boring Co.'s new tunnel designs would allow freight to be transported on purpose built platforms, labelled as “battery-powered freight carriers”. The document shows that, though the containers could technically fit within its current 12-foot tunnels, wider tunnels would be more efficient. Designs for a new tunnel, 21 feet in diameter, show that they can comfortably accommodate two containers side-by-side, with a one-foot gap between them.

The Boring Co.’s new drilling machine, dubbed Prufrock, can tunnel at a rate of one mile per week, which is six times faster than its previous machine, and is designed to ‘porpoise’ - mimicking the marine animal by ‘diving’ below ground and reemerging once the tunnel is complete. 

Tesla’s supply chain woes 

Tesla is facing its own supply chain and logistic issues. The EV manufacturer has raised the price of its vehicles, with CEO Musk confirming the incremental hike was a result of “major supply chain pressure”. Musk replied to a disgruntled Twitter user, confused as to why prices were rising while features were being removed from the cars, saying the “raw materials especially” were a big issue. 

Elon Musk Tweet

Car manufacturing continues to be one of the industries hit hardest by a global shortage in semiconductor chips. While China’s chip manufacturing levels hit an all-time high in May, and the US is proposing a 25% tax credit for chip manufacturers, demand still outstrips supply. Automakers including Volkswagen and Audi have again said they expect reduced vehicle output in the next quarter due to a lack of semiconductors, with more factory downtime likely

Top Image credit: The Boring Company / @boringcompany

Share article